New Proposal on Railroad Crossing Safety Will Do More Harm Than Good

Halli Brownfield
Halli Brownfield
Contributor
Posted by Halli BrownfieldSeptember 05, 2008 12:03 PM
Tags: None

The American Association for Justice (AAJ) reports that the Federal Highway Administration has proposed a policy that will require yield or stop signs at every railroad crossing in America. This policy may seem like a good public safety measure, but in reality it is anything but.

Studies show that the indiscriminate placement of stop signs at all rail road crossings would not enhance rail crossing safety. As the AAJ points out in its reponse and opposition to this policy submitted to the Federal Highway Administration, research has shown that collisions are more likely to occur at highway-rail grade crossings that have Stop signs than with any other form of warning. Stop signs should be used only after an engineering analysis has demonstrated that they are appropriate. The use of stop signs as a warning device at a particular railroad crossing may be inappropriate for many reasons. In the case of high speed rail crossings, a train may simply be traveling so fast that a motorist won't be able to see it approaching when it stops at the stop sign but cannot clear the crossing before the train arrives. In other situations, stop signs may be too far from the track for drivers to get a clear view of it. Currently, State and local highway agencies are vested with the discretion to decide whether to install Stop signs. This policy should not be changed.

As the AAJ points out, "the new requirement would afford immunity for those entities charged with monitoring such crossings where they clearly should not be entitled." In sum, not only would this policy do nothing to increase public safety, it would prevent individuals injured in rail crossing collisions where the use of a stop sign as the only form of a warning is negligent from holding anyone responsible for their negligence. Such a policy is contrary to the public interest.

For more information see:

http://www.atlanet.org/pressroom/PressReleases/2008/aug8.aspx

1 Comment

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Peter
Posted by Peter
September 05, 2008 1:51 PM

High-speed rail tracks should be grade-separated from the roadway, so the roadway (and sidewalk) are far above or below the railway. STOP and YIELD signs seem inappropriate when there is no danger of collision.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Cleveland

InjuryBoard Cleveland RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Cleveland is brought to you by Spangenberg Shibley & Liber

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Spangenberg Shibley & Liber (866) 735-1102 Ext 670 www.spanglaw.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Cleveland, Ashtabula, Brecksville, Brook Park, Brunswick, Chardon, Cleveland Heights, Eastlake, Elyria, Lakewood, Lorain, Macedonia, Medina, Mentor, North Ridgeville, Painesville, Parma, Rocky River, Solon, Stongsville, Willoughby
1001 Lakeside AvenueSuite 1700, Cleveland, Ohio 44114 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address